Joslin v. Combined Law Enforcement Associations of Texas
| John Joslin |
| Combined Law Enforcement Association of Texas and Combined Law Enforcement Associations of Texas |
| 1:2022cv00160 |
| April 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Marcia A Crone |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
SCHEDULING ORDER setting various deadlines.. Signed by District Judge Marcia A. Crone on 6/8/2022. (bjc, )
|
| Filing 10 Minute Entry for proceedings held before District Judge Marcia A. Crone: Scheduling Conference held on 6/8/2022. Counsel convened in chambers on June 8, 2022, to inform the court of the facts and issues in this civil action. The court and counsel agreed to a scheduling order which will govern all future proceedings. (bjc, ) |
| ***FILED IN ERROR. Document # 9, notice of attorney appearance. The attorney wanting to appear needs to file the notice using his login and password. PLEASE IGNORE.*** (bjc, ) |
| Filing 9 ***FILED IN ERROR. PLEASE IGNORE.*** NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Manuel Alfonso Quinto-Pozos on behalf of Combined Law Enforcement Associations of Texas (Quinto-Pozos, Manuel) Modified on 6/8/2022 (bjc, ). |
| Filing 8 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Plaintiff's proposed scheduling order, #2 Exhibit Defendant's proposed scheduling order)(Quinto-Pozos, Manuel) |
| Filing 7 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Quinto-Pozos, Manuel) |
| NOTICE of Hearing: Scheduling Conference set for 6/8/2022 at 2:30 PM in Ctrm 3 (Beaumont) before District Judge Marcia A. Crone. Counsel must appear in person.(jc, ) |
|
Filing 6
ORDERED that the parties conduct Rule 26(f) conference no later than May 20, 2022. Joint written report filed no later than June 3, 2022. Signed by District Judge Marcia A. Crone on 4/20/2022. (bjc, )
|
| Filing 4 ***ORIGINALLY FILED IN STATE COURT AND IS INCLUDED IN THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL.*** ANSWER to #3 Petition by Combined Law Enforcement Associations of Texas.(bjc, ) |
| Filing 3 ***ORIGINALLY FILED IN STATE AND IS INCLUDED IN THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL.*** PETITION against Combined Law Enforcement Associations of Texas.(bjc, ) |
| Filing 2 Supplement to #1 Notice of Removal. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit List of Attorneys)(Quinto-Pozos, Manuel) . |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by John Joslin. (bjc, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (bjc, ) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Marcia A. Crone. (bjc, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Combined Law Enforcement Association of Texas from 60th District Court, Jefferson County, case number B-209437. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0540-8881381), filed by Combined Law Enforcement Association of Texas. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court filings and docket)(Quinto-Pozos, Manuel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
