Armstrong et al v. AmGuard Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Willie Armstrong and Kimberly Armstrong
Defendant: AmGuard Insurance Company
Case Number: 1:2022cv00234
Filed: May 31, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Marcia A Crone
Referring Judge: Christine L Stetson
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 SCHEDULING ORDER setting various deadlines. Final Status Conference set for 7/7/2023 10:00 AM in Ctrm 3 (Beaumont) before District Judge Marcia A. Crone. The case will be set for Final Pretrial and Trial at the Final Status Conference. Parties should be prepared to try the case on this date. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine L. Stetson on 7/12/22. (kcv, )
July 12, 2022 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Christine L. Stetson: Scheduling Conference held on 7/12/2022. The following appeared for the hearing. Joseph Muckleroy for the plaintiff and Christopher Avery for the defendant. Deadlines were discussed and the court will enter a scheduling order setting the case for Final Status Conference before Judge Crone on July 7, 2023. (Court Time: 10:45 - 10:56 a.m.)(Courtroom Deputy/FTR OP: Sherre White.) (saw, )
July 11, 2022 Filing 13 NOTICE of Discovery Disclosure by Kimberly Armstrong, Willie Armstrong (Kothari, Nishi)
July 7, 2022 Filing 12 Submission of Proposed Agreed Docket Control/Scheduling order by AmGuard Insurance Company . (Bishop, Paul)
July 7, 2022 Filing 11 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Bishop, Paul)
July 7, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Paul William Bishop, III on behalf of AmGuard Insurance Company (Bishop, Paul)
July 7, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE by Kimberly Armstrong, Willie Armstrong Certificate of Interested Parties (Kothari, Nishi)
June 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDERED that Rule 26(f) conference must occur by June 28, 2022. Rule 16 Case Management/Scheduling Conference set for 7/12/2022 10:30 AM in Ctrm 4 (Beaumont) before Magistrate Judge Christine L. Stetson. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine L. Stetson on 6/8/2022. (bjc, )
June 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Christine L. Stetson. Signed by District Judge Marcia A. Crone on 6/3/2022. (bjc, )
June 1, 2022 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (tkd, )
June 1, 2022 Case assigned to District Judge Marcia A. Crone. (tkd, )
May 31, 2022 Filing 5 ORIGINAL ANSWER (filed in state court) to #4 Original Petition, filed by AmGuard Insurance Company.(tkd, )
May 31, 2022 Filing 4 ORIGINAL PETITION (filed in state court) against AmGuard Insurance Company, filed by Willie Armstrong, Kimberly Armstrong (defts The Best Claims Solutions Inc and Russell Yalowsky were dismissed in state court).(tkd, )
May 31, 2022 Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by AmGuard Insurance Company (Martin, Christopher)
May 31, 2022 Filing 2 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by AmGuard Insurance Company. (Martin, Christopher)
May 31, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by AmGuard Insurance Company from 128th JDC Orange County, Texas, case number 220130-C. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXEDC-8951563), filed by AmGuard Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Civil Cover Sheet)(Martin, Christopher) (Main Document 1 replaced with corrected heading and case number, Attachment 11 replaced with a flattened image on 6/1/2022) (tkd, ).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Armstrong et al v. AmGuard Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Willie Armstrong
Represented By: Derek Clinton Brasher
Represented By: Joseph Azor Muckleroy
Represented By: Nishi Vimal Kothari
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kimberly Armstrong
Represented By: Derek Clinton Brasher
Represented By: Joseph Azor Muckleroy
Represented By: Nishi Vimal Kothari
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AmGuard Insurance Company
Represented By: Christopher Weldon Martin
Represented By: Allison Wilma Ballentine
Represented By: Jamie Penton Cooper
Represented By: Paul William Bishop, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?