Vincent v. State Farm Lloyds
| Matthew Vincent |
| State Farm Lloyds |
| 1:2022cv00273 |
| July 7, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Michael J Truncale |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| NOTICE of Hearing: Case Management Conference RESET for 9/13/2022 03:30 PM in Chambers Room 221, before District Judge Michael J. Truncale. (jmv, ) |
| NOTICE of Hearing: Case Management Conference set for 8/26/2022 10:30 AM in Chambers Room 221 before District Judge Michael J. Truncale. (jmv, ) |
| Filing 5 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Kessler, Maxwell) |
| Set/Reset Hearings: Case Management Conference set for 8/16/2022 02:30 PM in Chambers before District Judge Michael J. Truncale. (jmv, ) |
Filing 4
ORDERED that Rule 26(f) Attorney Conference must occur by July 27, 2022. Rule 16 Case Management/Scheduling Conference set for 8/16/2022 02:30 AM in Room 221 (Beaumont) before District Judge Michael J. Truncale. Signed by District Judge Michael J. Truncale on 7/7/2022. (bjc, )
|
| Filing 3 ***ORIGINALLY FILED IN STATE COURT AND IS INCLUDED IN THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL.*** ANSWER to #2 Petition by State Farm Lloyds.(bjc, ) |
| Filing 2 ***ORIGINALLY FILED IN STATE COURT AND IS INCLUDED IN THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL.*** PETITION against State Farm Lloyds.(bjc, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by State Farm Lloyds from 172nd JDC, Jefferson County, Texas, case number E-209866. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXEDC-9007437), filed by State Farm Lloyds. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B)(Kessler, Maxwell) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Michael J. Truncale. (bjc, ) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by State Farm Lloyds, Matthew Vincent. (bjc, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (bjc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Vincent v. State Farm Lloyds | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Matthew Vincent | |
| Represented By: | Aaron Kevin Bender |
| Represented By: | Adam Michael Grable |
| Represented By: | Mark Christopher Sparks |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: State Farm Lloyds | |
| Represented By: | Maxwell M Kessler |
| Represented By: | Jazmine J. Ford |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
