Rash & Tinsley, Inc v. Scottsdale Insurance Company
| Rash & Tinsley Inc doing business as County Line Beverage Barn |
| Scottsdale Insurance Company |
| 1:2022cv00334 |
| August 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Michael J Truncale |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
SCHEDULING ORDER setting various deadlines. Final Pretrial Conference set for 6/1/2023 at 9:00 AM and Jury Selection/Trial set for 6/5/2023 at 9:00 AM in Ctrm 2 (Beaumont) before District Judge Michael J. Truncale. Signed by District Judge Michael J. Truncale on 9/27/22. (tkd, )
|
| Minute Entry for proceedings held before District Judge Michael J. Truncale: Case Management Conference held on 9/26/2022. Attorneys present: Joseph Muckleroy, Robert Wall. Court will enter Scheduling Order. (Court Reporter None.) (jmv, ) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE by Rash & Tinsley Inc Initial Disclosures (Kothari, Nishi) |
| Filing 9 STATUS REPORT Joint Conference Report by Scottsdale Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Appendix 1)(Kemp, Patrick) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by C Daniel DiLizia on behalf of Scottsdale Insurance Company (DiLizia, C) |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE to #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Scottsdale Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Kemp, Patrick) |
|
Filing 6
ORDERED that Rule 26(f) Attorney Conference must occur by 9/6/2022. Rule 16 Case Management/Scheduling Conference set for 9/26/2022 02:30 PM in Room 221 (Beaumont) before District Judge Michael J. Truncale. Signed by District Judge Michael J. Truncale on 8/17/2022. (bjc, )
|
| Filing 5 ***ORIGINALLY FILED IN STATE COURT AND IS INCLUDED IN THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL.*** AMENDED ANSWER to #3 Petition by Scottsdale Insurance Company. (bjc, ) |
| Filing 4 ***ORIGINALLY FILED IN STATE COURT AND IS INCLUDED IN THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL.*** ANSWER to #3 Petition by Scottsdale Insurance Company.(bjc, ) |
| Filing 3 ***ORIGINALLY FILED IN STATE COURT AND IS INCLUDED IN THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL.*** PETITION against Scottsdale Insurance Company.(bjc, ) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Scottsdale Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company for Scottsdale Insurance Company. (Wall, Robert) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Scottsdale Insurance Company from 260th Judicial District of Orange County, Texas, case number 220246-C. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXEDC-9072896), filed by Scottsdale Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 List of All Parties in Lawsuit, #6 List of Parties Requesting Jury Trial, #7 List of Counsel, #8 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kemp, Patrick) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (bjc, ) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Rash & Tinsley Inc. (bjc, ) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Michael J. Truncale. (bjc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
