Medliant Inc. v. Galam
Medliant Inc. |
Axel Ysrael F. Galam |
1:2022cv00379 |
September 16, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Michael J Truncale |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Aileen Ligot Dizon on behalf of Axel Ysrael F. Galam (Dizon, Aileen) |
Filing 9 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Proposed Scheduling Order, #2 Exhibit 2 - Proposed Protective Order)(Bundren, Russell) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Discovery Disclosure by Medliant Inc. regarding Plaintiff's Initial Mandatory Disclosures (Bundren, Russell) |
Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Axel Ysrael F. Galam as to #5 ORDER directing the parties to conduct a Rule 26(f) Attorney Conference by October 19, 2022. Rule 16 Case Management/Scheduling Conference set for 11/29/2022 at 10:30 AM in Room 221 before District Judge Michael J. Truncale. (bmf, ) |
Filing 6 RESPONSE in Opposition re #4 MOTION to Dismiss MOTION to Transfer filed by Medliant Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Declaration of Allen B. Miller, Jr., #2 Exhibit 2 - 2018 Offer Letter, #3 Exhibit 3 - 2018 Employment Agreement, #4 Exhibit 4 - December 2020 email, #5 Exhibit 5 - January 2021 email, #6 Exhibit 6 - 2021 Offer Letter, #7 Exhibit 7 - 2021 Employment Agreement, #8 Exhibit 8 - July 2021 email, #9 Exhibit 9 - July 2021 Galam email, #10 Exhibit 10 - Judicial Caseload Profile, #11 Text of Proposed Order)(Bundren, Russell) |
Filing 5 ORDER directing the parties to conduct a Rule 26(f) Attorney Conference by October 19, 2022. Rule 16 Case Management/Scheduling Conference set for 11/29/2022 at 10:30 AM in Room 221 before District Judge Michael J. Truncale. Signed by District Judge Michael J. Truncale on 9/30/22. (kcv, ) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss or in the Alternative, MOTION to Transfer by Axel Ysrael F. Galam. (kcv, ) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Medliant Inc.. Axel Ysrael F. Galam served on 9/20/2022, answer due 10/11/2022. (Bundren, Russell) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued as to Axel Ysrael F. Galam and sent via email to plaintiff's counsel for service. (bmf, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Axel Ysrael F. Galam ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXEDC-9131720.), filed by Medliant Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Bundren, Russell) |
Case assigned to District Judge Michael J. Truncale. (bmf, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Medliant Inc. v. Galam | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Medliant Inc. | |
Represented By: | Russell Brandon Bundren |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Axel Ysrael F. Galam | |
Represented By: | Aileen Ligot Dizon |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.