Nettles v. Garrido
Petitioner: Carl G Nettles
Respondent: F J Garrido
Case Number: 1:2022cv00575
Filed: December 6, 2022
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Zack Hawthorn
Referring Judge: Michael J Truncale
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - FEDERAL HABEAS PETITION. Respondent to file response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Copy of order mailed to U.S. Attorneys Office. Petitioner's reply to respondent's answer, if any, is due within 21 days of the filing of respondent's answer. Signed by Magistrate Judge Zack Hawthorn on 2/3/23. (tkd, )
February 1, 2023 Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Carl G Nettles on 1/17/2023 as to #5 Report and Recommendation. (tkd, )
January 23, 2023 Filing 6 OBJECTION to #5 Report and Recommendation by Carl G Nettles. (tkd, )
January 17, 2023 Filing fee: $5.00, receipt number 100021598 (tkd, )
January 10, 2023 Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus should be dismissed without prejudice for want of prosecution pursuant to FRCP 41(b). Signed by Magistrate Judge Zack Hawthorn on 1/10/23. (tkd, )
December 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER. It is ordered that Petitioner shall, within twenty (20) days, submit the $5.00 filing fee or an application to proceed in forma pauperis accompanied by a statement prepared by an authorized official showing the average balance in, and average deposits to, Petitioner's inmate trust account for the preceding six months. Signed by Magistrate Judge Zack Hawthorn on 12/7/22. (kcv, )
December 6, 2022 Filing 3 Case transferred in from District of Missouri Eastern; Case Number 4:22-cv-01248. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
December 6, 2022 Case assigned to District Judge Michael J. Truncale. (bjc, )
December 6, 2022 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Zack Hawthorn. (bjc, )
November 22, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 2. Tue Nov 22 15:30:01 CST 2022 (Phillips, Nicole) [Transferred from Missouri Eastern on 12/6/2022.]
November 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER OF TRANSFER TO OTHER DISTRICT to: Eastern District of Texas ( Case to be transferred after 12/5/2022.). Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 11/21/2022. (NEP) [Transferred from Missouri Eastern on 12/6/2022.]
November 21, 2022 Filing 1 Document treated as Motion to amend/correctsentencing computation construed as PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS UNDER 28 U.S.C. 2241 per court order. by Petitioner Carl G. Nettles. (DLB) [Transferred from Missouri Eastern on 12/6/2022.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nettles v. Garrido
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Carl G Nettles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: F J Garrido
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?