Pevey v. Grewal et al
| Samantha Pevey |
| Karamvir S Grewal and N Vik, Inc |
| 1:2023cv00300 |
| August 4, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Michael J Truncale |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Set/Reset Hearings: Scheduling/Case Management Conference set for 10/5/2023 at 02:00 PM in Ctrm 2 (Beaumont) before District Judge Michael J. Truncale. (bjc, ) |
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Motion to Continue. The Case Management Conference is reset for October 5, 2023 at 2:00 PM in Room 221, Jack Brooks Federal Courthouse, 300 Willow Street, Beaumont, TX. The Parties are ordered to file any edits to their Joint Conference Report and proposed Scheduling Order on or before 10/2/2023. Signed by District Judge Michael J. Truncale on 8/24/2023. (bjc, )
|
| ***FILED IN ERROR. INCORRECTLY SET FOR 2:00 AM.**** Set Deadlines/Hearings: Scheduling/Case Management Conference reset for 10/5/2023 at 02:00 AM in Room 221 (Beaumont) before District Judge Michael J. Truncale. (bjc, ) Modified on 9/14/2023 (bjc, ). |
| Filing 7 Agreed MOTION to Continue Case Management Conference by N Vik, Inc, Karamvir S Grewal (Burck, H) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/23/2023: #1 Proposed Order) (bjc, ). |
| Filing 6 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Agreed Scheduling Order)(Burck, H) |
| NOTICE of Hearing: Case Management Conference RESET for 9/22/2023 at 11:30 AM in CHAMBERS before District Judge Michael J. Truncale. (jmv, ) |
|
Filing 5
ORDERED that Rule 26(f) Attorney Conference must occur by August 25, 2023. Scheduling/Case Management Conference set for 9/14/2023 at 10:00 AM in Room 221 (Beaumont) before District Judge Michael J. Truncale. Signed by District Judge Michael J. Truncale on 8/9/2023. (bjc, )
|
| Filing 4 ***ORIGINALLY FILED IN STATE COURT AND IS INCLUDED IN THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL.*** ANSWER to #3 Petition by Karamvir S Grewal, N Vik, Inc.(bjc, ) |
| Filing 3 ***ORIGINALLY FILED IN STATE COURT AND IS INCLUDED IN THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL.*** PETITION against Karamvir S Grewal, N Vik, Inc.(bjc, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (bjc, ) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Karamvir S Grewal, N Vik, Inc, Samantha Pevey. (bjc, ) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Michael J. Truncale. (bjc, ) |
| Filing 2 Defendants' Original ANSWER to Complaint by Karamvir S Grewal, N Vik, Inc.(Burck, H) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by All Defendants from 58th Judicial District, Jefferson County, Texas, case number 23DCCV9396. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXEDC-9636343), filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Plaintiff's Original Petition (State), #2 Exhibit Statement of Information of Corporation, #3 Exhibit Defendants' Original Answer (State), #4 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Exhibit State Court Docket Sheet, #6 Exhibit List of Parties and Attorneys)(Burck, H) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
