Duran v. Pare et al
| Jose Duran |
| S. Bailey, Dorothy C. Carleton, Harouna Pare, D. Yisa, Jacquelyn Womack, M.D. Frank Saunders and T. Tompkins |
| 1:2025cv00002 |
| January 2, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Marcia A Crone |
| Christine L Stetson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 19, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Acknowledgment of Receipt by Jose Duran on 2/11/2025 as to #2 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. (KMH) |
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Jose Duran.(KMH) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Admissions by Jose Duran. (KMH) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Plaintiff's Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents by Jose Duran. (KMH) |
| Filing 2 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Complaint filed by Jose Duran. It is recommended that Plaintiff should be denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The action should be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g), unless Plaintiff pays the $405.00 filing fee within fourteen days from the date this Report and Recommendation is entered. Objections due within 14 days of receipt. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine L. Stetson on 2/3/2025. (CC: by mail, Duran).(KMH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Jose Duran.(KMH) |
| CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Christine L. Stetson. (KMH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
