Peoples v. Stephens
| Raymond Reginald Peoples, Jr |
| Zena Stephens |
| 1:2025cv00477 |
| September 29, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Zack Hawthorn |
| Michael J Truncale |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 FINAL JUDGMENT that pltf take nothing, and this lawsuit is dismissed without prejudice. All motions not previously ruled on are denied. Signed by District Judge Michael J. Truncale on 3/18/2026. (Motion #3 terminated) Mailed to Peoples on 3/18/2026. (SCM) |
Filing 8
MEMORANDUM ORDER adopting #7 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Michael J. Truncale on 3/18/2026. Mailed to Peoples on 3/18/2026.(SCM)
|
| Filing 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that this action be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(b). Objections due within 14 days of receipt. Signed by Magistrate Judge Zack Hawthorn on 1/27/2026. Mailed w/ ack card to Peoples on 1/28/2026. (SCM) |
| Filing 6 Acknowledgment of Receipt by Raymond Reginald Peoples, Jr as to #4 Order for Initial Partial Filing Fee (no received dated indicated). (SCM) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER for Initial Partial Filing Fee of $13.70 within 30 days for Raymond Reginald Peoples, Jr.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Zack Hawthorn on 10/7/2025. Mailed to Peoples w/ ack card on 10/7/2025. (SCM)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Raymond Reginald Peoples, Jr. (bmf) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT (severed from 1:25cv117) against Zena Stephens, filed by Raymond Reginald Peoples, Jr.(SCM) |
|
Filing 1
ORDER severing pltf's claims from 1:25cv117. These claims will proceed as a civil rights action. Signed by Magistrate Judge Zack Hawthorn on 9/29/2025. Mailed to Peoples with Notice of Case Assignment on 9/29/2025.(SCM)
|
| Case referred to Magistrate Judge Zack Hawthorn pursuant to a Standing Order. (SCM) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. Mag Form mailed to Peoples on 9/29/2025. (SCM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Peoples v. Stephens | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Raymond Reginald Peoples, Jr | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Zena Stephens | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
