Viewpointe Archive Services, LLC v. Datatreasury Corporation Featured Case
Plaintiff: Viewpointe Archive Services, LLC
Defendant: Datatreasury Corporation
Case Number: 2:2005cv00459
Filed: September 29, 2005
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office: Marshall Office
County: Anderson
Presiding Judge: David Folsom
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 145 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 4, 2007 Opinion or Order Filing 46
ORDER granting 45 Motion to Consolidate Cases . ORDERED that Viewpointe Archive Services LLC v DataTreasury Corp, Case No 2:05cv459 be consolidated with DataTreasury Corp v Wells Fargo & Company et al Case No 2:06cv72. FURTHER ORDERED that the Court's Status Conference scheduled for 4/4/07 in Viewpointe Archive Services LLC v DataTreasury Case No 2:05-cv-459, ve vacated and removed from the Court's Docket. Signed by Judge David Folsom on 4/4/07. (mpv, ) Modified on 4/4/2007 (mpv, ).
February 19, 2007 Filing 43
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Karl Anthony Rupp on behalf of Datatreasury Corporation (Rupp, Karl)
February 15, 2007 Filing 42
NOTICE of Hearing: Status Conference set for 4/4/2007 02:30 PM in Ctrm 319 (Texarkana) before Judge David Folsom. (mrm, ) Modified on 4/4/2007 (mpv, ). ***VACATED PER ORDER #46***
October 18, 2005 Opinion or Order Filing 41
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge David Folsom for all further proceedings. Judge Leonard Davis no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 10/18/05. (ehs, )
October 13, 2005 Filing 40
NOTICE by Viewpointe Archive Services, LLC re 39 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Withdrawal of Notice of Dismissal (Unopposed) (Wilcox, Melvin)
October 7, 2005 Filing 39
NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Viewpointe Archive Services, LLC (Wilcox, Melvin)
October 4, 2005 Opinion or Order Filing 38
ORDER OR RECUSAL - REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Leonard Davis for all further proceedings. Judge T. John Ward no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 10/4/05. (ehs, )
September 29, 2005 Filing 37
Case transferred in from District of Northern; Case Number 3:05cv1355. Original file with documents numbered 1-36, certified copy of transfer order, order denying pltf's emergency motion to stay and docket sheet received, filed by Viewpointe Archive Services, LLC.(ehs, ) Additional attachment(s) added on 9/30/2005 (ehs, ). Additional attachment(s) added on 9/30/2005 (ehs, ). Additional attachment(s) added on 9/30/2005 (ehs, ). Additional attachment(s) added on 9/30/2005 (ehs, ). Additional attachment(s) added on 9/30/2005 (ehs, ).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Viewpointe Archive Services, LLC v. Datatreasury Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Viewpointe Archive Services, LLC
Represented By: Edward V Filardi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Datatreasury Corporation
Represented By: Karl Anthony Rupp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?