LaserDynamics, Inc. v. Asus Computer International et al
| 2:2006cv00348 |
| August 31, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Marshall Office |
| T. John Ward |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
735
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - granting in part and denying in part motion 667 to exclude the expert reports and corresponding trial testimony of defendant Quanta Computer, Inc.s (Quanta) expert, Richard G. Zech. This order moots Lasers motion to exclude Dr. Zechs non-infringing alternatives report on the grounds that it provides an invalidity analysis and, as such, is beyond the scope of the new damages trial (Dkt. No. 649).. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles Everingham on 1/20/11. (ehs, )
|
|
Filing
624
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - After considering the traditional equitable factors, the Court concludes that LaserDynamics has not shown that a permanent injunction is proper in this case. Thus, the Court DENIES LaserDynamics request for a permanent injunction. The Court CARRIES LaserDynamics request for post judgment royalties against QCI until after the new trial on damages has been completed. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 6/22/10. (ehs, )
|
|
Filing
620
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - The Court has carefully considered the parties submissions, the record, and the applicable law. For the reasons stated above, the Court GRANTS QCIs motion for new trial on damages or for remittitur. LaserDynamics has ten (10) days from the entry of this order to either elect the remitted award of $6.2 million or to have a new trial on the issue of damages. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 6/9/10. (ehs, )
|
|
Filing
562
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER finding that the '981 patent is not uneforceable and DENIES Defendants' motion. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 8/17/09. (djh, )
|
|
Filing
303
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER regarding discovery matters as set forth herein and imposes the described sanctions on the Asus defendants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles Everingham on 1/21/09. (ehs, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: LaserDynamics, Inc. v. Asus Computer International et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
