Gellman v. ADT Security Services Inc et al
| Tobi Gellman |
| ADT Security Services Inc, Diebold, Incorporated, Digital Security Controls, Inc., Europlex Technologies (USA) Inc., Napco Security Systems, Inc., Protection One, Inc., Telulr Corporation and Numerex Corp. |
| 2:2007cv00282 |
| July 6, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Marshall Office |
| Dallas |
| T. John Ward |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
194
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - Because standing to bring this civil action depends on legal rather than equitable title, and all parties holding legal title were not joined as Plaintiffs, Defendants motion to dismiss for lack of standing is GRANTED. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff may refile in the future if she gains full legal title to the patent in suit. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles Everingham on 12/14/10. (ehs, )
|
|
Filing
62
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION that the dfts have failed to satisfy their burden of showing either that this court l acks personal jurisdiction over them or that there is good cause that necessitates a transfer in this case. The court finds that the competing factors do n ot justify a transfer. Dfts' motion to is denied. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 9/10/08. (djh, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
