MHL TEK, LLC v. Nissan Motor Co et al
| MHL TEK, LLC |
| Nissan North America, Inc., Nissan Technical Center North America, Inc., Volkswagen of America, Inc., Volkswagen AG, Subaru of America, Inc., Subaru of Indiana Automotive, Inc., Isuzu Motors America, Inc., Fuji Heavy Industries, Ltd., Kia Motors Corporation, Kia Motors America, Inc., Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG, Porsche Cars North America, Inc., Audi AG, Audi of America, Inc., Bayerische Motoren Werke AG, Hyundai Motor Co., Hyundai Motor America, Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama LLC, Isuzu Motors Limited, BMW of North America LLC, BMW Manufacturing Co. LLC and Nissan Motor Co. |
| 2:2007cv00289 |
| July 13, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Marshall Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| T. John Ward |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
615
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - BMW and Porsches, Hyundai and Kias, VW and Audis, and Nissans motions for summary judgment are GRANTED, and the Schrader/TRW defendants motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in part. The accused devices do not literally infringe the asserted claims of the 516 patent. Furthermore, the all elements rule and prosecution history estoppel bar MHL from asserting infringement under the doctrine of equivalents. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 2/24/10. (ehs, )
|
|
Filing
443
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER denying 278 MOTION for Reconsideration re 269 Order on Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 11/4/09. (ehs, )
|
|
Filing
371
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - The court adopts the constructions set forth in this opinion for the disputed terms of the patents. The parties are ordered that they may not refer, directly or indirectly, to each others claim construction positions in the presence of the jury. Likewise, the parties are ordered to refrain from mentioning any portion of this opinion, other than the actual definitions adopted by the court, in the presence of the jury. Any reference to claim construction proceedings is limited to informing the jury of the definitions adopted by the court. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 8/28/09. (ehs, )
|
|
Filing
251
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER denying motions to reconsider transfer. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 2/23/09. (ehs, )
|
|
Filing
184
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER denying motion # 92 and # 111 to transfer venue. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 9/10/08. (ehs, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
