SynQor, Inc. v. Artesyn Technologies, Inc. et al
| SynQor, Inc. |
| Artesyn Technologies, Inc., Astec America, Inc., Emerson Network Power, Inc., Emerson Electric Co., Bel Fuse Inc., Cherokee International Corp., Delta Electronics, Inc., Delta Products Corp., Murata Electronics North America, Inc., Murata Manufacturing Co., Inc., Tyco Electronics Ltd., Tyco Electronics Corp. and Power-One, Inc. |
| 2:2007cv00497 |
| November 13, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Marshall Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Charles Everingham |
| T. John Ward |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
1310
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS-IN-PART and DENIES-IN-PART. The Court orders Defendants to pay an award of costs in the following amounts herein. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 9/29/2011. (ch, )
|
|
Filing
1266
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - SynQors motion for JMOL is GRANTED-in-part and DENIED-in-part. The Court DENIES SynQors motion for JMOL on the validity issues of public use bar, on-sale bar, anticipation, obviousness, and written description. The Court GRANTS SynQors motion for JMOL on the validity issue of best mode. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 8/17/11. (ehs, )
|
|
Filing
1249
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - The Court finds that the defendants have not proven by clear and convincing evidence that SynQor committed prosecution laches during prosecution of the applications in the patents-in-suit. Thus, the Court finds that the patents-in-suit are not invalid or unenforceable and therefore rules in favor of SynQor. The Court DENIES SynQors requests for attorneys fees and costs relating to the equitable issues in this case. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 7/13/11. (ehs, )
|
|
Filing
1247
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - ruling set forth herein. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles Everingham on 7/12/11. (ehs, )
|
|
Filing
1242
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - the Court ORDERS Delta to pay SynQor $567,514.00 for the 17,000 additional sales of Delta's Q48SB9R650 converter to Cisco that were not included in Delta's previous sales data for the period ending Octobe r 31, 2010, and the 2,000 sales of Deltas Q48SB9R650 converter to Cisco that were not included in Delta's previous sales data for the period from November 1, 2010 through January 24, 2011. The Court holds that Delta is subject to sanctions for v arious discovery violations as described in this Memorandum Opinion & Order. The Court ORDERS Delta to pay $500,000.00 in civil contempt sanctions to SynQor in this case. The Court awards attorneys fees and costs to SynQor that are attributable to Deltas discovery abuses in this case. The Court has considered lesser sanctions, but finds that such sanctions would be ineffective to cure the prejudice resulting from Deltas conduct and deter such conduct in the future.. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 7/11/11. (ehs, )
|
|
Filing
1061
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion to strike Defendants affirmative defenses and/or counterclaims of inequitable conduct is DENIED as moot.. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 3/24/11. (ehs, )
|
|
Filing
931
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - SynQors motion for a permanent injunction is GRANTED and Defendants request for stay pending appeal is DENIED.. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 1/24/11. (ehs, )
|
|
Filing
506
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - the Court adopts, in their entirety, the reports of the United States Magistrate Judge as the conclusions of this Court (Dkt. Nos. 489, 490, and 491). Accordingly, Plaintiffs motion to strike Bel Fuses ineq uitable conduct defenses (Dkt. No. 334), Plaintiffs motion strike Lineage and Cherokees inequitable conduct defenses and counterclaims (Dkt. No. 335), and Plaintiffs motion to strike the Fish Defendants inequitable conduct defenses and counterclaims (Dkt. No. 336) are GRANTED and the inequitable conduct defenses and counterclaims of Bel Fuse, Lineage, Cherokee, and the Fish Defendants are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FURTHER ORDERS that leave is granted for Bel Fuse, Lineage, Cherokee, and the Fish Defendants to file amended inequitable conduct defenses and counterclaims within fourteen days of the date of this order.. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 9/28/10. (ehs, )
|
|
Filing
474
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - The Court adopts the constructions set forth in this opinion for the disputed terms of the patents-in-suit. The parties are ordered that they may not refer, directly or indirectly, to eachothers claim construction posit ions in the presence of the jury. Likewise, the parties are ordered to refrain from mentioning any portion of this opinion, other than the actual definitions adopted by the Court, in the presence of the jury. Any reference to claim construction proceedings is limited to informing the jury of the definitions adopted by the Court.. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 7/26/10. (ehs, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
