Dogleg Right Partners, LP et al v. TaylorMade Golf Company Inc
| Dogleg Right Partners, LP and Dogleg Right Corporation |
| TaylorMade Golf Company Inc |
| 2:2007cv00533 |
| December 6, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Marshall Office |
| Collin |
| Charles Everingham |
| T. John Ward |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
168
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - For the foregoing reasons, the court GRANTS Defendants motion for partial summary judgment of non-infringement. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles Everingham on 6/6/2011. (ch, )
|
|
Filing
103
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - The court adopts the constructions set forth in this opinion for the disputed terms of the852, 169, and 450 Patents. The parties are ordered that they may not refer, directly or indirectly, to each others claim construc tion positions in the presence of the jury. Likewise, the parties are ordered to refrain from mentioning any portion of this opinion, other than the actual definitions adopted by the court, in the presence of the jury. Any reference to claim construction proceedings is limited to informing the jury of the definitions adopted by the court.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles Everingham on 3/22/11. (ehs, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
