Pact XPP Technologies, AG v. Xilinx, Inc., et al
Plaintiff: Pact XPP Technologies, AG
Defendant: Xilinx, Inc., and Avnet, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2007cv00563
Filed: December 28, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office: Marshall Office
County: Anderson
Presiding Judge: Charles Everingham
Presiding Judge: T. John Ward
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 448 MEMORANDUM ORDER granting 401 Motion for Attorney's Fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 8/3/2013. (rsp1)
August 27, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 440 MEMORANDUM ORDER - Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 8/27/2013. (ch, )
May 11, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 353 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION - Defendants objections to Mr. Nawrockis opinions have been overruled, Defendants motion is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S Payne on 5/10/12. (ehs, )
April 26, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 346 MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER granting in part and denying in part Pltf's Motion to Strike Certain Expert Opinions of Deft's Expert Mr. McAlexander. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S Payne on 4/26/12. (ehs, )
April 25, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 345 MEMORANDUM ORDER - Xilinxs and Avnets Motion to Exclude Dr. Tredennicks Opinion on Inducement (Dkt. No. 187) is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S Payne on 4/25/2012. (ch, )
April 11, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 321 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - PACT XPP Technologies, AGs Motion to Exclude the Expert Disclosure of Dr. Trimberger (Dkt. No. 176) and its Motion to Exclude the Rebuttal Disclosure of Dr. Stephen Trimberger (Dkt. No. 177) are DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S Payne on 4/11/12. (ehs, )
March 27, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 319 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re Plaintiff Pact XPP Technologies, AG's Motion to Exclude Robert Munch. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S Payne on March 27, 2012. (jml)
March 26, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 317 MEMORANDUM and ORDER - denying PACT's motion for summary judgment # 172 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S Payne on 3/26/12. (ehs, )
June 17, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 201 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION regarding Claim Construction. The Court adopts the constructions set forth in this opinion for the disputed terms and disputed phrases of the patents-in-suit. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles Everingham on June 17, 2011. (jml)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pact XPP Technologies, AG v. Xilinx, Inc., et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pact XPP Technologies, AG
Represented By: Joseph Samuel Grinstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Xilinx, Inc.,
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Avnet, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?