Foster v. Lacy
Robert Foster |
Vickie Lacy |
2:2008cv00162 |
June 23, 2008 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Habeas Corpus (General) Office |
Harrison |
Charles Everingham |
David Folsom |
None |
Federal Question |
28:1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Ordered that the court adopts the report of the Magistrate Judge. That the writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Petitioner is hereby DENIED a certificate of appealability sua sponte. All pending motions are hereby DENIED. Signed by Judge David Folsom on 2/9/09. (ch, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Foster v. Lacy | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Robert Foster | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Vickie Lacy | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.