Intel Corporation v. Negotiated Data Solutions, LLC

Plaintiff: Intel Corporation
Defendant: Negotiated Data Solutions, LLC
Case Number: 2:2008cv00319
Filed: August 15, 2008
Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Office: Patent Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: T. John Ward
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2201 Declaratory Judgement

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 18, 2010 137 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - For the reasons articulated herein, Intels motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, and N Datas motion for summary judgment is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles Everingham on 3/18/10. (ehs, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Intel Corporation v. Negotiated Data Solutions, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Intel Corporation
Represented By: Jeannine Y Sano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Negotiated Data Solutions, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.