Shifferaw v. EMSON USA et al
| Tessema Dosho Shifferaw |
| EMSON USA, E Mishan & Sons, Inc., Academy, Ltd dba Academy Sports & Outdoors and Amazon.com, Inc. |
| 2:2009cv00054 |
| February 19, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Patent Office |
| Travis |
| Charles Everingham |
| T. John Ward |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 35:271 Patent Infringement |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - The court orders that the claims against Mishan be severed from the claims against the Retailer Defendants. The court finds, based on the consideration of both private and public interest factors in this case, that the Southern District of New York is a more convenient forum than this district for the claims against Mishan. Thus, the court orders that the severed claims against Mishan be transferred to the Southern District of New York. Further, the court orders th at, in the interests of justice, the remaining claims against the Retailer Defendants, Amazon and Academy, be stayed in this court pending resolution of the action against Mishan in the transferred case. The court orders the Retailer Defendants to file a stipulation with the court within fourteen days of this order agreeing to be bound by the rulings of the suit against Mishan in the Southern District of New York. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles Everingham on 3/18/10. (ehs, )
|
| Filing 1 |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
