Anderson v. Good Shepherd Medical Center et al
| Elizabeth Anderson |
| Good Shepherd Medical Center and Jose Angel Rocha |
| 2:2009cv00112 |
| April 15, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Insurance Office |
| Rusk |
| T. John Ward |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 28:2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
65
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - Before the Court is Defendant Manziel Law Offices (Manziel) Motion to Dismiss Under Rules 12(b)(2), 12(b)(5), 12(b (1), and 12(b)(6) (Dkt. No. 45). The Court is of the opinion that the motion should be GRANTED-inpart a nd DENIED-in-part. The Court QUASHES Plaintiffs attempt at service on Manziel and ORDERS that Plaintiff re-serve Manziel in accordance with Federal Rule of Evidence 4(e) or Texas Rule of Evidence 106 within 10 days from the date of this order. The Co urt DENIES Manziels motion to dismiss on all other grounds. Manziel has 10 days to answer after being properly re-served. The Court sets this case for trial on the Courts August 2011 docket. The Pretrial Hearing will be held on July 28, 2011 at 2:30 p.m. Jury selection is set on Monday, August 1, 2011 at 9:00 a.m.. The parties are ordered to meet and confer and submit a new docket control and discovery order within 10 days after Manziel answers.. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 3/7/11. (ehs, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
