Vick et al v. NCO Financial Systems, Inc. et al
| Arthur Vick and Virginia Vick |
| NCO Financial Systems, Inc. and GE Capital Financial Inc. |
| 2:2009cv00114 |
| April 17, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Consumer Credit Office |
| Gregg |
| Charles Everingham |
| T. John Ward |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
99
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 95 Report and Recommendations. ORDERED that NCOs motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in- PART and DENIED-in-PART. The court GRANTS NCOs motion as to Plaintiffs claim that NCO violated the FDCPA by a ttempting to collect a time-barred debt and as to NCOs argument that Mr. Arthur Vick lacks third-party standing under the FDCPA. The court DENIES NCOs motion for summary judgment on all other grounds. Furthermore, the court GRANTS NCOs motion for leave to file the supplemental affidavit of Mr. Stevens and DENIES Plaintiffs motion to strike Mr. Stevens affidavit as moot.. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 3/28/11. (ehs, )
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 48 Report and Recommendations and denies 24 Motion to Dismiss filed by GE Capital Financial Inc.. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 3/30/10. (ehs, )
|
|
Filing
45
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER denying # 22 motion to transfer venue. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles Everingham on 2/26/10. (ehs, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
