Walden v. City of Linden

Walden v. City of Linden

Plaintiff:	Marie Walden
Defendant:	City of Linden
Case Number:	2:2009cv00238
Filed:	August 11, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office:	Marshall Office
County:	Cass
Presiding Judge:	T. John Ward
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 18, 2009	Filing 22 MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - Ms. Waldons complaint is hereby DISMISSED. The Court grants Ms. Waldon leave to amend her complaint within ten days to properly, if possible, state claims for negligence and municipal liability under 42 U.S.C. § 67; 1983, 1985(3). Ms. Waldons claims for defamation and false imprisonment are dismissed with prejudice, as there are no additional facts that she could allege to establish those claims. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles Everingham on 12/18/09. (ehs, )
December 15, 2009	Filing 20 *VACATED PER ORDER # 21 **MEMORANDUM AND OPINION AND ORDER - Ms Waldons complaint is hereby DISMISSED. The court grants Ms Waldon leave to amend her complaint within ten days to properly, state claims for negligennce and municipal liability under 42 USC 1983 1985(3) Ms. Waldons claims for defamation and false imprisonment are dismissed with prejudice, as there are no additional facts that she couldallege to establish those claims. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 12/15/09. (ch, ) Modified on 12/16/2009 (ch, ).

Date Filed

Document Text

December 18, 2009

Filing 22 MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - Ms. Waldons complaint is hereby DISMISSED. The Court grants Ms. Waldon leave to amend her complaint within ten days to properly, if possible, state claims for negligence and municipal liability under 42 U.S.C. § 67; 1983, 1985(3). Ms. Waldons claims for defamation and false imprisonment are dismissed with prejudice, as there are no additional facts that she could allege to establish those claims. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles Everingham on 12/18/09. (ehs, )

December 15, 2009

Filing 20 ***VACATED PER ORDER # 21 ****MEMORANDUM AND OPINION AND ORDER - Ms Waldons complaint is hereby DISMISSED. The court grants Ms Waldon leave to amend her complaint within ten days to properly, state claims for negligennce and municipal liability under 42 USC 1983 1985(3) Ms. Waldons claims for defamation and false imprisonment are dismissed with prejudice, as there are no additional facts that she couldallege to establish those claims. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 12/15/09. (ch, ) Modified on 12/16/2009 (ch, ).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Walden v. City of Linden
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marie Walden
Represented By:	Edwin Errol Buckner, Jr
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: City of Linden
Represented By:	Gary Harold Shaver
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?