v. Deere & Company et al
| Ralph Wayne Boozer and Katherine Boozer |
| Deere & Company, Cummins Generator Technologies, Individually and Industrial Generator & Engines, Inc. |
| 2:2009cv00243 |
| August 17, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Marshall Office |
| Nacogdoches |
| Charles Everingham |
| T. John Ward |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 19 Report and Recommendations, denying 16 Motion to Dismiss filed by Industrial Generator & Engines, Inc. and granting pltf's leave to file an amended complaint within fourteen days. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 8/25/10. (ehs, )
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Magistrate Judge recommends that the court deny the dft's motion to dismiss, and instead recommends treating it as a motion for a more definite statement. The court adopts, in its entirety, the report of the United States Magistrate Judge as the conclusions of this court. Accordingly, the court orders the plaintiffs to file an amended complaint, within seven days of this order, that clearly alleges their causes of action, this courts subject matter jurisdiction, and facts demonstrating that this district is a proper venue. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 3/29/2010. (ch, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
