Network Protection Sciences, LLC v. Juniper Networks, Inc. et al
| Network Protection Sciences, LLC |
| Juniper Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc., WatchGuard Technologies, Inc., SonicWALL, Inc. and Deep Nines, Inc. |
| 2:2010cv00224 |
| July 6, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Marshall Office |
| Harrison |
| Charles Everingham |
| T. John Ward |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
121
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - Considering all of the private and public interest factors, Defendants have shown that the Northern District of California is clearly more convenient than the Eastern District of Texas. Four of the § 1404(a) factors weigh in favor of transfer, and the rest are neutral or do not apply. None of the factors weigh against transfer. As such, Defendants motion to transfer venue is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 1/23/2012. (ch, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
