Chesapeake Louisiana, L.P. v. Buffco Production, Inc. et al
| Chesapeake Louisiana, L.P. |
| Buffco Production, Inc., Twin Resources, LLC, Wayne E Freeman, Freeman Capital, Ltd., Freeman Resources, Ltd. and FRM GP LLC |
| 2:2010cv00359 |
| September 13, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Marshall Office |
| Harrison |
| T. John Ward |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
212
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - the Court hereby GRANTS-IN-PART and DENIES-IN PART the parties pending motions for summary judgment. Trial on the severed and surviving issues set forth above is hereby CONTINUED from the current trial setting of April 2, 2012 to be reset at a future date by the Court. All remaining pre-trial matters and deadlines as relate to these severed and surviving issues are STAYED until further Order of this Court. Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 6/28/12. (ehs, )
|
|
Filing
209
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - The Freeman Defendants Motion to Dismiss for Want of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction is DENIED. Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 6/7/12. (ehs, )
|
|
Filing
192
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - Pending before the Court are the following motions for summary judgment: 69 , 77 , 78 , 79 , the court holds that each is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows herein. Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 3/22/2012. (ch, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
