Luv N' Care, LTD. et al v. Royal King Infant Products Co., Ltd. et al
| Luv N' Care, LTD. and Admar International, Inc. |
| Royal King Infant Products Co., Ltd. and Dalbir Singh Khurana |
| 2:2010cv00461 |
| November 4, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Marshall Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
288
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER -. Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 7/6/2016. (ch, )
|
|
Filing
283
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 1/28/2016. (ch, )
|
|
Filing
282
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER -. Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 1/5/2016. (ch, )
|
|
Filing
277
ORDER denying 242 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 3/20/15. (jrg3)
|
|
Filing
234
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER -. Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 2/14/2014. (ch, )
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - filed by the Magistrate Judge on June 28, 2012 (Dkt. No. 49). Defendants Motions to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (Dkt. Nos. 14 and 26) are GRANTED to the extent of dismissing without prejudice all claims against Defendant Dalbir Khurana other than the claims of fraudulent inducement, and otherwise DENIED, and (2) that the Motions to Dismiss Under Rule 12(b)(6) (Dkt. Nos. 15 and 27) be DENIED. Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 8/6/12. (ehs, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
