Kilts Resources, LLC v. Brother International Corporation
| Kilts Resources LLC |
| Brother International Corporation |
| 2:2010cv00542 |
| December 9, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Marshall Office |
| Gregg |
| T John Ward |
| Patent |
| 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2011. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER DISMISSING CASE - pursuant to the Notice of Voluntary Dismissal without prejudice, all claims are dismissed without prejudice, each party to bear its own fees and costs. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 3/18/11. (ehs, )
|
| Filing 6 STIPULATION of Dismissal by Kilts Resources LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Huff, Winston) |
| Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is GRANTED pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Brother International Corporation to 3/16/2011. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( sm, ) |
| Filing 5 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Brother International Corporation.( Longstaff, Carrie) |
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Kilts Resources LLC. Brother International Corporation waiver sent on 12/15/2010, answer due 2/14/2011. (ehs, ) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Huff, Winston) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Kilts Resources, LLC (Huff, Winston) |
| Case assigned to Judge T. John Ward. (ch, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available here by clicking on the hyperlink and is also on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice of Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT For False Patent Marking against Brother International Corporation ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 0540-2796138.), filed by Kilts Resources, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Civil Cover Sheet)(Huff, Winston) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kilts Resources, LLC v. Brother International Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kilts Resources LLC | |
| Represented By: | Winston Oliver Huff |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Brother International Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Carrie A Longstaff |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
