Darty v. Comm of SSA
Plaintiff: Bernice Edwards Darty
Defendant: Commissioner of SSA
Case Number: 2:2011cv00051
Filed: January 27, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office: Marshall Office
County: Henderson
Presiding Judge: Charles Everingham
Presiding Judge: T. John Ward
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1383
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 12, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 8 Report and Recommendations. ORDERED that the action is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). It is further ORDERED that any motion not previously ruled on is DENIED. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 9/12/11. (ehs, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Darty v. Comm of SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bernice Edwards Darty
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?