Darty v. Comm of SSA
Bernice Edwards Darty |
Commissioner of SSA |
2:2011cv00051 |
January 27, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Marshall Office |
Henderson |
Charles Everingham |
T. John Ward |
Supplemental Security Income |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1383 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 8 Report and Recommendations. ORDERED that the action is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). It is further ORDERED that any motion not previously ruled on is DENIED. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 9/12/11. (ehs, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Darty v. Comm of SSA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Bernice Edwards Darty | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner of SSA | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.