Ellis v. Yellow Book Sales and Distribution Company, Inc.
Plaintiff: Scott Ellis
Defendant: Yellow Book Sales and Distribution Company Inc
Case Number: 2:2011cv00138
Filed: March 2, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office: Marshall Office
County: Smith
Presiding Judge: T. John Ward
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 2, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 22 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 3/2/2012. (ch, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ellis v. Yellow Book Sales and Distribution Company, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Scott Ellis
Represented By: Thomas Andrew Crosley
Represented By: Charles E Ames
Represented By: Jeffrey Todd Embry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Yellow Book Sales and Distribution Company Inc
Represented By: Thomas Miles Farrell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?