Apple Inc.
| Apple Inc. |
| 2:2012cv00036 |
| January 20, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Marshall Office |
| Anderson |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1782 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2012. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Ex Parte Application for An Order Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782 Granting Leave to Obtain Discovery for Use in Foreign Proceedings and Supporting Memorandum against Apple Inc. ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 0540-3410912.), filed by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Declarataion of Christine Saunders Haskett in Support, # 4 Haskett Ex. 1, # 5 Haskett Ex. 2, # 6 Haskett Ex. 3)(Haslam, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Apple Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Apple Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Robert Thomas Haslam, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
