DietGoal Innovations LLC v. Genghis Grill Franchise Concepts, LP
Plaintiff: DietGoal Innovations LLC
Defendant: Genghis Grill Franchise Concepts, LP
Case Number: 2:2012cv00777
Filed: December 7, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office: Marshall Office
County: Travis
Presiding Judge: Rodney Gilstrap
Presiding Judge: Roy S. Payne
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Both
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DietGoal Innovations LLC v. Genghis Grill Franchise Concepts, LP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Genghis Grill Franchise Concepts, LP
Represented By: Michael Scott Fuller
Represented By: Anthony Michael Vecchione
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DietGoal Innovations LLC
Represented By: Christopher Michael Joe
Represented By: Brian Andrew Carpenter
Represented By: Niknaz Forughi Bukovcan
Represented By: Eric William Buether
Represented By: Monica Nguyen Tavakoli
Represented By: Damon Michael Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?