Database Sync Solutions LLC v. International Business Machines Corporation

Defendant: International Business Machines Corporation
Plaintiff: Database Sync Solutions LLC
Case Number: 2:2013cv00214
Filed: March 15, 2013
Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Office: Marshall Office
County: Collin
Referring Judge: Roy S. Payne
Presiding Judge: Michael H. Schneider
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 11, 2014 64 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 08/11/2014. (nkl, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Database Sync Solutions LLC v. International Business Machines Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: International Business Machines Corporation
Represented By: Mark Nolan Reiter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Database Sync Solutions LLC
Represented By: Keith Bryan Smiley
Represented By: Charles Craig Tadlock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?