TQP Development LLC v. Chrysler Group LLC

Plaintiff: TQP Development LLC
Defendant: Chrysler Group LLC
Case Number: 2:2013cv00219
Filed: March 18, 2013
Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Office: Marshall Office
County: Harrison
Presiding Judge: Rodney Gilstrap
Referring Judge: Roy S. Payne
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 23, 2014 184 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Signed by Judge William C. Bryson on 7/23/14. (mrm, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: TQP Development LLC v. Chrysler Group LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: TQP Development LLC
Represented By: Alexander Chester Giza
Represented By: James A Fussell, III
Represented By: Marc A Fenster
Represented By: Kevin Burke
Represented By: Adam S Hoffman
Represented By: Paul Anthony Kroeger
Represented By: Andrew W. Spangler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chrysler Group LLC
Represented By: Megan S Woodworth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.