Phoenix Licensing, L.L.C. et al v. AT&T Mobility, LLC et al
Plaintiff: LPL Licensing, L.L.C. and Phoenix Licensing, L.L.C.
Defendant: AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T, Inc. and AT&T Mobility, LLC
Not Classified By Court: David Folsom
Case Number: 2:2013cv01083
Filed: December 11, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office: Marshall Office
County: Anderson
Presiding Judge: Rodney Gilstrap
Referring Judge: Roy S Payne
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2015. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 19, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER granting Motion to Dismiss AT&T Mobility LLC denying #21 MOTION to Change Venue. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 5/18/2015. (ch, )
November 7, 2014 Filing 26 SUR-REPLY to Reply to Response to Motion re #21 MOTION to Change Venue filed by LPL Licensing, L.L.C., Phoenix Licensing, L.L.C.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit F)(Wang, Benjamin)
October 27, 2014 Filing 25 REPLY to Response to Motion re #21 MOTION to Change Venue filed by AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T, Inc.. (Govett, Brett)
October 16, 2014 Filing 24 RESPONSE in Opposition re #21 MOTION to Change Venue filed by LPL Licensing, L.L.C., Phoenix Licensing, L.L.C.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Declaration of Benjamin T. Wang, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E)(Wang, Benjamin)
October 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER granting #22 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #21 MOTION to Change Venue Responses due by 10/16/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 10/7/2014. (ch, )
October 2, 2014 Filing 22 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #21 MOTION to Change Venue by LPL Licensing, L.L.C., Phoenix Licensing, L.L.C.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Wang, Benjamin)
September 12, 2014 Filing 21 MOTION to Change Venue by AT&T Mobility, LLC, AT&T, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Darren T. Smith, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6, #8 Exhibit 7, #9 Exhibit 8, #10 Exhibit 9, #11 Exhibit 10, #12 Exhibit 11, #13 Exhibit 12, #14 Exhibit 13, #15 Exhibit 14, #16 Exhibit 15, #17 Exhibit 16, #18 Exhibit 17, #19 Exhibit 18, #20 Exhibit 19, #21 Exhibit 20, #22 Exhibit 21, #23 Text of Proposed Order)(Govett, Brett)
June 17, 2014 Filing 20 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Eagle Howard Robinson on behalf of AT&T Mobility, LLC (Robinson, Eagle)
March 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER; The above-captioned cases are hereby ORDERED to be CONSOLIDATED for all pretrial issues (except venue) with the LEAD CASE, Cause No. 2:13-cv-1081. All parties are instructed to file any future filings (except relating to venue) in the LEAD CASE. Individual cases remain active for venue determinations and trial. The Court will enter one docket control order, one protective order, and one discovery order that will govern the entire consolidated case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 3/11/14. (mrm, )
March 7, 2014 Filing 18 AMENDED COMPLAINT against AT&T, Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC, filed by Phoenix Licensing, L.L.C., LPL Licensing, L.L.C..(Wang, Benjamin)
March 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 17 PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 3/5/2014. (ch, )
March 3, 2014 Filing 16 Agreed MOTION for Protective Order by LPL Licensing, L.L.C., Phoenix Licensing, L.L.C.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Wang, Benjamin)
February 6, 2014 Filing 15 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Daniel S Leventhal on behalf of AT&T Mobility, LLC, AT&T, Inc. (Leventhal, Daniel)
February 4, 2014 Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is GRANTED pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for AT&T, Inc. to 3/12/2014; AT&T Mobility, LLC to 3/12/2014. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, )
February 3, 2014 Filing 14 Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re AT&T Mobility, LLC, AT&T, Inc..( Govett, Brett)
January 6, 2014 Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Phoenix Licensing, L.L.C., LPL Licensing, L.L.C.. (mrm, )
January 6, 2014 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is GRANTED pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for AT&T, Inc. to 2/10/2014; AT&T Mobility, LLC to 2/10/2014. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, )
January 3, 2014 Filing 12 Defendants' Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Inc.( Gaffney, Brian)
December 30, 2013 Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed for AT&T, Inc. served on 12/19/2013, answer due 1/9/2014. (bas, )
December 13, 2013 Filing 10 SUMMONS Issued as to AT&T, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 AT&T Mobility LLC)(ch, )
December 12, 2013 Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Daymon Jeffrey Rambin on behalf of LPL Licensing, L.L.C., Phoenix Licensing, L.L.C. (Rambin, Daymon)
December 12, 2013 Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Elizabeth L DeRieux on behalf of LPL Licensing, L.L.C., Phoenix Licensing, L.L.C. (DeRieux, Elizabeth)
December 12, 2013 Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Sidney Calvin Capshaw, III on behalf of LPL Licensing, L.L.C., Phoenix Licensing, L.L.C. (Capshaw, Sidney)
December 12, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 12/21/2013. (ch, )
December 12, 2013 Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Marc A Fenster on behalf of LPL Licensing, L.L.C., Phoenix Licensing, L.L.C. (Fenster, Marc)
December 12, 2013 Filing 4 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(Wang, Benjamin)
December 12, 2013 Filing 3 NOTICE by LPL Licensing, L.L.C., Phoenix Licensing, L.L.C. of Related Cases (Wang, Benjamin)
December 12, 2013 Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by LPL Licensing, L.L.C., Phoenix Licensing, L.L.C. (Wang, Benjamin)
December 12, 2013 Case assigmed to Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (ch, )
December 12, 2013 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice of Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, )
December 11, 2013 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against AT&T Mobility, LLC, AT&T, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-4439837.), filed by Phoenix Licensing, L.L.C., LPL Licensing, L.L.C.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Civil Cover Sheet, #9 Civil Cover Sheet Attachment)(Wang, Benjamin)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Phoenix Licensing, L.L.C. et al v. AT&T Mobility, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LPL Licensing, L.L.C.
Represented By: Elizabeth L DeRieux
Represented By: Paul Anthony Kroeger
Represented By: Marc A Fenster
Represented By: Daymon Jeffrey Rambin
Represented By: Sidney Calvin Capshaw, III
Represented By: Benjamin T Wang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Phoenix Licensing, L.L.C.
Represented By: Elizabeth L DeRieux
Represented By: Paul Anthony Kroeger
Represented By: Marc A Fenster
Represented By: Daymon Jeffrey Rambin
Represented By: Sidney Calvin Capshaw, III
Represented By: Benjamin T Wang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AT&T Mobility LLC
Represented By: Brett Christopher Govett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AT&T, Inc.
Represented By: Daniel S Leventhal
Represented By: Brian James Gaffney
Represented By: Brett Christopher Govett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AT&T Mobility, LLC
Represented By: Daniel S Leventhal
Represented By: Brian James Gaffney
Represented By: Eagle Howard Robinson
Represented By: Brett Christopher Govett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not classified by court: David Folsom
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?