Innovative Display Technologies LLC v. Google Inc et al Featured Case
Plaintiff: Innovative Display Technologies LLC
Defendant: Google Inc and Motorola Mobility LLC
Case Number: 2:2014cv00302
Filed: April 8, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office: Marshall Office
County: Collin
Presiding Judge: Rodney Gilstrap
Presiding Judge: Roy S. Payne
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2014. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 9, 2014 SUMMONS Issued as to Google Inc, Motorola Mobility LLC. (nkl, )
April 9, 2014 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice of Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (mrm, )
April 8, 2014 Filing 5 NOTICE by Innovative Display Technologies LLC Plaintiff's Notice Of Related Cases (Bragalone, Jeffrey)
April 8, 2014 Filing 4 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Bragalone, Jeffrey)
April 8, 2014 Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Innovative Display Technologies LLC identifying Other Affiliate Acacia Research Corporation, Other Affiliate Acacia Research Group LLC for Innovative Display Technologies LLC. (Bragalone, Jeffrey)
April 8, 2014 Case Assigned to Judge Rodney Gilstrap and Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (mrm, )
April 8, 2014 Filing 2 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Innovative Display Technologies LLC. (Bragalone, Jeffrey)
April 8, 2014 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Google Inc, Motorola Mobility LLC ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-4603556.), filed by Innovative Display Technologies LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C, # 5 Exhibit D, # 6 Exhibit E, # 7 Exhibit F, # 8 Exhibit G)(Bragalone, Jeffrey)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Innovative Display Technologies LLC v. Google Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Innovative Display Technologies LLC
Represented By: Jeffrey Ray Bragalone
Represented By: Claire Abernathy Henry
Represented By: Thomas John Ward, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Google Inc
Represented By: Michael E Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Motorola Mobility LLC
Represented By: Michael E Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?