Batarga LLC v. Kate Spade, LLC
Plaintiff: Batarga LLC
Defendant: Kate Spade, LLC
Case Number: 2:2015cv01441
Filed: August 22, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office: Marshall Office
County: Collin
Presiding Judge: Rodney Gilstrap
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 8, 2016 Filing 12 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120) at termination of case. AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (nkl, )
February 8, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 02/06/2016. (nkl, )
October 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER; The above-captioned cases are hereby ORDERED to be CONSOLIDATED for all pretrial issues (except venue) with the LEAD CASE, Cause No. 2:15-cv-1432. All parties are instructed to file any future filings (except relating to venue) in the LEAD CASE. Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 10/28/15. (mrm, )
October 23, 2015 Filing 9 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Kate Spade, LLC identifying Corporate Parent The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. for Kate Spade, LLC. (McNabnay, Neil)
October 23, 2015 Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim by Kate Spade, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(McNabnay, Neil)
September 16, 2015 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Batarga LLC. Kate Spade, LLC served on 9/1/2015. (ch, )
September 9, 2015 Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Kate Spade, LLC to 10/23/2015. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, )
September 3, 2015 Filing 6 Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Kate Spade, LLC.( McNabnay, Neil)
August 25, 2015 Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued as to Kate Spade, LLC. (ch, )
August 25, 2015 Case assigned to Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (ch, )
August 24, 2015 Filing 4 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Bailey, David)
August 24, 2015 Filing 3 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Batarga LLC. (Bailey, David)
August 24, 2015 Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Batarga LLC (Bailey, David)
August 22, 2015 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kate Spade, LLC ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-5354084.), filed by Batarga LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - U.S. Patent. No. 6,233,682, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Bailey, David)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Batarga LLC v. Kate Spade, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Batarga LLC
Represented By: David Alan Bailey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kate Spade, LLC
Represented By: Ricardo Joel Bonilla
Represented By: Neil J McNabnay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?