Batarga LLC v. Tween Brands, Inc.
Batarga LLC |
Tween Brands, Inc. |
2:2015cv01452 |
August 22, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Marshall Office |
Collin |
Rodney Gilstrap |
Patent |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2015. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120) at termination of case. AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (nkl, ) |
Filing 13 ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 12/07/2015. (nkl, ) |
Filing 12 ORDER; The above-captioned cases are hereby ORDERED to be CONSOLIDATED for all pretrial issues (except venue) with the LEAD CASE, Cause No. 2:15-cv-1432. All parties are instructed to file any future filings (except relating to venue) in the LEAD CASE. Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 10/28/15. (mrm, ) |
Filing 11 ORDER granting #8 Motion to Stay All Deadlines and Notice of Settlement. Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 10/27/2015. (nkl, ) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Peter J Brann on behalf of Tween Brands, Inc. (Brann, Peter) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Peter J Brann on behalf of Tween Brands, Inc. (Brann, Peter) |
Filing 8 Joint MOTION to Stay and Notice of Settlement by Batarga LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bailey, David) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Batarga LLC for Tween Brands, Inc.. (nkl, ) |
Filing 6 Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Tween Brands, Inc..( McNabnay, Neil) |
Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Tween Brands, Inc. to 10/22/2015. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( nkl, ) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued as to Tween Brands, Inc. Via Registered Agent at: CT Corporation. (nkl, ) |
Case assigned to Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (ch, ) |
Filing 4 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Bailey, David) |
Filing 3 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Batarga LLC. (Bailey, David) |
Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Batarga LLC (Bailey, David) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Tween Brands, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-5354132.), filed by Batarga LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - U.S. Patent. No. 6,233,682, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Bailey, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Batarga LLC v. Tween Brands, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Batarga LLC | |
Represented By: | David Alan Bailey |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Tween Brands, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Peter J Brann |
Represented By: | Neil J McNabnay |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.