TiVo Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., LTD., et al
| TiVo Inc. |
| Samsung Electronics Co., LTD.,, Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC |
| 2:2015cv01503 |
| September 8, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Marshall Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
129
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 64 TiVo's Motion to Compel Defendants to Respond to Interrogatory Nos. 1 & 4, Produce Associated Discovery, and Produce Customer Agreements; granting 71 Samsung's Motion to Compel TiVo to Respo nd to Interrogatory No. 18; granting in part and denying in part 72 Samsung's Opposed Motion for Leave to Amend Its First Amended Invalidity Contentions; granting 75 TiVo's Emergency Motion to Clarify Discovery Obligations in Light of P rior Protective Orders; denying 76 Samsung's Opposed Motion for Leave to Amend Its Second Amended Invalidity Contentions; granting in part and denying in part 108 Samsung's Motion to Strike Portions of TiVo's Supplemental Infringement Contentions; granting 125 TiVos Motion to Clarify Discovery Obligations in Light of Prior Protective Orders. Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 7/22/2016. (jrg2)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
