Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations,LLC v. Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff: Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations,LLC
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Case Number: 2:2015cv01876
Filed: November 25, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office: Marshall Office
County: Collin
Presiding Judge: Roy S Payne
Referring Judge: Robert W Schroeder
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 3, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER granting #16 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 11/03/2016. (nkl, )
November 2, 2016 Filing 16 Unopposed MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Ford Motor Company by Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations,LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Johnson, Jay)
May 18, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER granting #14 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Albert F Harris, III terminated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 05/18/2016. (nkl, )
May 17, 2016 Filing 14 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney of Albert F. Harris, III by Ford Motor Company. (Mudd, Jason) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/17/2016: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (nkl, ).
April 18, 2016 Filing 13 SUR-REPLY to Reply to Response to Motion re #10 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed R Civ P 12(b)(6) and 35 USC 101 Plaintiff's Surreply to Defendant's Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss filed by Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations,LLC. (Johnson, Jay)
April 7, 2016 Filing 12 REPLY to Response to Motion re #10 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed R Civ P 12(b)(6) and 35 USC 101 filed by Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Mudd, Jason)
March 28, 2016 Filing 11 RESPONSE in Opposition re #10 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed R Civ P 12(b)(6) and 35 USC 101 Plaintiff's Opposition to Motion For Judgment On The Pleadings filed by Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations,LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A to the Declaration of Fang Qiu)(Johnson, Jay)
March 10, 2016 Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed R Civ P 12(b)(6) and 35 USC 101 by Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Mudd, Jason)
March 10, 2016 Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Albert F Harris, III on behalf of Ford Motor Company (Harris, Albert)
March 10, 2016 Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Eric A Buresh on behalf of Ford Motor Company (Buresh, Eric)
March 10, 2016 Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jason R Mudd on behalf of Ford Motor Company (Mudd, Jason)
February 22, 2016 Filing 6 Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Ford Motor Company.( Siebman, Clyde)
February 22, 2016 Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Ford Motor Company to 3/10/2016. 15 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( nkl, )
January 20, 2016 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Ford Motor Company to 2/24/2016. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( nkl, )
January 19, 2016 Filing 5 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Ford Motor Company.( Siebman, Clyde)
January 5, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge Rodney Gilstrap recused. Case reassigned to Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III for all further proceedings. Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 01/04/2016. (nkl, )
December 8, 2015 Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued as to Ford Motor Company. (nkl, )
November 28, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 11/28/15. (ch, )
November 28, 2015 Case assigned to Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (ch, )
November 28, 2015 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, )
November 25, 2015 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Original Complaint against Ford Motor Company ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-5500381.), filed by Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations,LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Johnson, Jay)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations,LLC v. Ford Motor Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations,LLC
Represented By: Jay Brett Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Represented By: Eric Allan Buresh
Represented By: Jason R Mudd
Represented By: Albert F Harris, III
Represented By: Clyde Moody Siebman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?