Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al
| Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd |
| T-Mobile US, Inc. and T-Mobile USA, Inc. |
| 2:2016cv00056 |
| January 15, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Marshall Office |
| XX Outside US |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Roy S. Payne |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
329
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 323 Report and Recommendations, 314 Sealed Motion, filed by Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd, Huaweis objections are OVERRULED. Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 9/28/2017. (nkl, )
|
|
Filing
316
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 288 Report and Recommendations, 119 Motion to Dismiss filed by Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd. Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 9/6/2017. (nkl, )
|
|
Filing
317
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 307 Report and Recommendations, 248 Sealed Motion, filed by Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd, 313 OBJECTION OVERRULED. Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 9/6/2017. (nkl, )
|
|
Filing
214
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 5/24/2017. (nkl, )
|
|
Filing
170
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 143 Report and Recommendations, 26 Motion to Dismiss filed by T-Mobile US, Inc., T-Mobile USA, Inc.. Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 3/24/2017. (nkl, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
