Alacritech Inc. v. CenturyLink, Inc.
Alacritech Inc. |
CenturyLink, Inc. |
Alacritech Inc. |
Wistron Corporation, Wiwynn Corporation, SMS Infocomm Corporation and Dell Inc. |
2:2016cv00693 |
June 30, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Marshall Office |
Anderson |
Rodney Gilstrap |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 909 MEMORANDUM ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 10/12/2023. (nkl, ) |
Filing 892 ORDER granting 846 Stipulation. Court ACCEPTS AND ACKNOWLEDGES that all claims and causes of action asserted between Alacritech and Cavium, including claims involving Cavium products against Wistron and Dell, in member cases 2:16-cv- 00692, 2:16- cv- 00695 are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. In light of this Order, and the joint notice filed by the parties, Dkt. Nos. 609, 636, 637 & 639 are DENIED AS MOOT. All other pending requests for relief between Cavium, Alacritech, and Wistron in the above- captioned case not explicitly granted herein are DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk of Court is directed to MAINTAIN AS OPEN the above-captioned case and member cases 2:16-cv-00692, 2:16-cv-00695.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 10/13/2023. (ch, ) |
Filing 887 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 849 Report and Recommendations, 853 Report and Recommendations, 851 Report and Recommendations, 847 Report and Recommendations. ORDERED that Defendant Dells Motion for Partial Summary Judgm ent of Non- Infringement and in the Alternative a Motion to Strike Unsupported Opinions of Dr. Almeroth (Docket No. 630) is DENIED-AS-MOOT. ORDERED that Dells Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of No Willful Infringement and No Indirect Infringeme nt (Docket No. 604) is DENIED. Plaintiff Alacritechs Motion for Summary Judgment on Defendants License and Related Patent Exhaustion Defenses and Motion for Partial Summary Judgment that. Broadcom Products are Not Non-Infringing Alternatives (Docke t No. 606) is DENIED. ORDERED Intervenor Intels Motion for Summary Judgment of No Direct Infringement and Defendants Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of No Direct Infringement (Docket No. 610) is DENIED. ORDERED that Plaintiff Alacritechs Part ial Motion for Summary Judgment of No Invalidity in View of IPR Estoppel (Docket No. 607) is GRANTED-IN-PART as to the Thia/Tanenbaum combination and the Rütsche32/Stevens II combination. The remainder of this motion is DENIED-AS-MOOT. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 10/12/2023. (ch, ) |
Filing 882 MEMORANDUM ORDER - granting in part 626 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 10/10/2023. (ch, ) |
Filing 875 MEMORANDUM ORDER -. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 10/9/2023. (ch, ) |
Filing 866 MEMORANDUM ORDER Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 10/08/2023. (klc, ) |
Filing 364 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - Denying without prejudice 339 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 9/22/2017. (ch, ) |
Filing 362 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON CLAIM CONSTRUCTION. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 9/21/2017. (nkl, ) |
Filing 356 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - denying 59 Motion to Transfer. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 9/19/2017. (ch, ) |
Filing 327 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re 184 SEALED MOTION for Leave to Serve Amended Infringement Contentions and File Amended Complaint Against Defendants Wistron Corporation and Wiwynn Corporation filed by Alacritech Inc... Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 8/20/2017. (nkl, ) |
Filing 306 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - granting in part 259 Motion to Strike a Portion ofAlacritechs Patent Rule 3-1 Infringement Contentions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 7/14/2017. (ch, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.