Nokia Solutions and Network US LLC et al v. Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd
Plaintiff: Nokia Solutions and Network US LLC and Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy
Defendant: Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd and Huawei Device USA, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2016cv00756
Filed: July 11, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office: Marshall Office
County: Anderson
Presiding Judge: Rodney Gilstrap
Presiding Judge: Roy S. Payne
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 24, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 90 CLAIM CONSTRUCTION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 5/24/2017. (nkl, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nokia Solutions and Network US LLC et al v. Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nokia Solutions and Network US LLC
Represented By: Ross Ritter Barton
Represented By: Robert Julian Caison
Represented By: Linda Chang
Represented By: Deron R Dacus
Represented By: Thomas W Davison
Represented By: Michael Clayton Deane
Represented By: Marsha Ellen Diedrich
Represented By: M Joseph John Ravindra Fernando
Represented By: Patrick John Flinn
Represented By: John Daniel Haynes
Represented By: Samuel Clinton Merritt
Represented By: Derek Scott Neilson
Represented By: Michael J Newton
Represented By: Matthew Scott Stevens
Represented By: Nicholas Tang Tsui
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy
Represented By: Ross Ritter Barton
Represented By: Robert Julian Caison
Represented By: Linda Chang
Represented By: Deron R Dacus
Represented By: Thomas W Davison
Represented By: Michael Clayton Deane
Represented By: Marsha Ellen Diedrich
Represented By: M Joseph John Ravindra Fernando
Represented By: Patrick John Flinn
Represented By: John Daniel Haynes
Represented By: Samuel Clinton Merritt
Represented By: Derek Scott Neilson
Represented By: Michael J Newton
Represented By: Matthew Scott Stevens
Represented By: Nicholas Tang Tsui
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd
Represented By: David M Barkan
Represented By: Carl Edward Bruce
Represented By: Jane J Du
Represented By: Thomas Howard Reger, II
Represented By: Brian Gregory Strand
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Huawei Device USA, Inc.
Represented By: David M Barkan
Represented By: Carl Edward Bruce
Represented By: Deron R Dacus
Represented By: Jane J Du
Represented By: Thomas Howard Reger, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?