KAIST IP US LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., LTD., et al
| KAIST IP US LLC |
| Samsung Electronics Co., LTD., Samsung Electronics America, Inc, Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Samsung Austin Semiconductor, LLC, GlobalFoundries, Inc., GlobalFoundries U.S. Inc. and Qualcomm Inc. |
| 2:2016cv01314 |
| November 29, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Marshall Office |
| Anderson |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Roy S. Payne |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
676
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 578 SEALED MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law on Non-Infringement and Invalidity filed by GlobalFoundries U.S. Inc., Qualcomm Inc., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.,, Samsung Austin Semiconductor, LLC, Samsung Electronics America, Inc, Samsung Electronics Co., LTD.,, GlobalFoundries, Inc., 586 SEALED PATENT MOTION for Enhancement of Damages Due to Willful Infringement filed by KAIST IP US LLC, 580 SEALED MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law on Willfulness filed by Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.,, Samsung Austin Semiconductor, LLC, Samsung Electronics America, Inc, Samsung Electronics Co., LTD.,, 579 SEALED MOTION for New Trial and Contingent Motion of Defendants Globalfoundries Inc., Globalfoundries U.S. Inc., and Qualcomm Inc. for New Trial filed by GlobalFoundries U.S. Inc., Qualcomm Inc., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.,, Samsung Austin Semiconductor, LLC, Samsung Electronic s America, Inc, Samsung Electronics Co., LTD.,, GlobalFoundries, Inc., 577 SEALED MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law for Damages of No More Than $6.2 Million filed by Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.,, Samsung Austin Semicondu ctor, LLC, Samsung Electronics America, Inc, Samsung Electronics Co., LTD.,, 651 MOTION to Stay Case Pending Ex Parte Reexamination filed by GlobalFoundries U.S. Inc., Qualcomm Inc., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.,, Samsung Austin Semiconductor, LLC, Samsung Electronics America, Inc, Samsung Electronics Co., LTD.,, GlobalFoundries, Inc... Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 2/13/2020. (nkl, )
|
|
Filing
457
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The Court therefore OVERRULES Defendants objections and ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 143). Accordingly, the Court DENIES GlobalFoundries U.S. Inc.s Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Transfer Venue (Dkt. No. 75) and Qualcomm Inc.s Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Transfer Venue (Dkt. No. 97). Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 06/06/2018. (klc, )
|
|
Filing
453
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 225 SEALED MOTION to Exclude Opinion and Testimony of Plaintiff's Damages Expert Roy Weinstein filed by GlobalFoundries U.S. Inc., Qualcomm Inc., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.,, Samsung Austin Semiconductor, LLC, Samsung Electronics America, Inc, Samsung Electronics Co., LTD.,, GlobalFoundries, Inc.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 6/5/2018. (nkl, )
|
|
Filing
442
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 219 Opposed SEALED PATENT MOTION to Strike and Exclude Portions of the Rebuttal Expert Report of Vivek Subramanian, Ph.D. filed by KAIST IP US LLC.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 5/29/2018. (nkl, )
|
|
Filing
435
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 220 Opposed SEALED PATENT MOTION to Strike and Exclude Portions of the Opening Expert Report of Vivek Subramanian Ph.D. Contrary to the Court's Claim Construction and Orders filed by KAIST IP US LLC. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 5/17/2018. (nkl, )
|
|
Filing
348
MEMORANDUM OPINION re 215 Opposed SEALED PATENT MOTION for Leave to Supplement Expert Reports of David B. Witt and Roy Weinstein filed by KAIST IP US LLC.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 4/16/2018. (nkl, )
|
|
Filing
179
CLAIM CONSTRUCTION MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER -. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 2/2/18. (ch, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
