Traxcell Technologies, LLC v. Huawei Technologies USA Inc.
Traxcell Technologies, LLC |
Huawei Technologies USA Inc. |
2:2017cv00042 |
January 12, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Marshall Office |
Harris |
Roy S. Payne |
Robert W. Schroeder |
Patent |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 459 ORDERED that Traxcells objections (Docket No. 449) and Nokias objections (Docket No. 450) are OVERRULED, and Magistrate Judge Paynes memorandum order (Docket No. 448) is ADOPTED as the opinion of the District Court. It is further ORDERED that Defendant Nokias Motion for Attorneys Fees (Docket No. 418) is GRANTED-IN-PART as previously ordered. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 3/24/2023. (ch, ) |
Filing 411 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 386 Report and Recommendations. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 12/11/2019. (nkl, ) |
Filing 394 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 386 Report and Recommendations. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 7/9/2019. (nkl, ) |
Filing 264 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 245 Report and Recommendations. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 1/10/2019. (nkl, ) |
Filing 261 CLAIM CONSTRUCTION MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 1/4/2019. (nkl, ) |
Filing 142 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 114 Emergency MOTION to Strike and Impose Sanctions filed by SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., 109 Joint MOTION for Hearing re 76 MOTION TO ENFORCE THE COURT'S ORDER (D.I.57) filed by SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., 122 Emergency MOTION to Strike Plaintiff's Infringement Contentions and Impose Sanctions filed by Huawei Technologies USA Inc., 127 Unopposed MOTION to Amend/Correct < i>Docket Control Order filed by SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., Nokia Solutions and Networks US LLC, Huawei Technologies USA Inc., Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy, ALE USA Inc. dba Alcatel-Lucent Enterprise USA Inc., 118 Emergency MOTION to Strike PLAINTIFF'S INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS AND IMPOSE SANCTIONS filed by ALE USA Inc. dba Alcatel-Lucent Enterprise USA Inc., 120 Emergency MOTION to Strike Plaintiff's Infringement Contentions and Impose Sanctions filed by Nokia Solutions and Networks US LLC, Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 12/21/2017. (nkl, ) |
Filing 89 ORDER ADOPTING 60 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Signed by Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 10/11/2017. (sm, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Traxcell Technologies, LLC v. Huawei Technologies USA Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Traxcell Technologies, LLC | |
Represented By: | William P Ramey, III |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Huawei Technologies USA Inc. | |
Represented By: | KD Shull |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.