511 TECHNOLOGIES INC.; and CADDO SYSTEMS, INC., v. Microsoft Corporation
Plaintiff: 511 TECHNOLOGIES INC.; and CADDO SYSTEMS, INC.,
Defendant: Microsoft Corporation
Case Number: 2:2017cv00178
Filed: March 6, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office: Marshall Office
County: Anderson
Presiding Judge: Rodney Gilstrap
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 2, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 2, 2017 Filing 17 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120) at termination of case. AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (ch, )
May 2, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER granting #14 Motion to Dismiss with prejudice. Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 5/2/2017. (ch, )
May 2, 2017 ***FILED IN ERROR - a proposed order should not be filed on the docket as a separate entry. Document # 15, Additional Attachments to Main Document. PLEASE IGNORE.*** (nkl, )
May 1, 2017 Filing 15 FILED IN ERROR Additional Attachments to Main Document: #14 Joint MOTION to Dismiss COMPLAINT.. (Kroeger, Paul) Modified on 5/2/2017 (nkl, ).
May 1, 2017 Filing 14 Joint MOTION to Dismiss COMPLAINT by 511 TECHNOLOGIES INC.; and CADDO SYSTEMS, INC.,. (Kroeger, Paul) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/2/2017: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (nkl, ).
April 24, 2017 Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Microsoft Corporation to 5/13/2017. 15 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( nkl, )
April 21, 2017 Filing 13 Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Microsoft Corporation.( Killough, David)
March 14, 2017 Filing 12 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Paul Anthony Kroeger on behalf of 511 TECHNOLOGIES INC.; and CADDO SYSTEMS, INC., (Kroeger, Paul)
March 14, 2017 Filing 11 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Arka D Chatterjee on behalf of 511 TECHNOLOGIES INC.; and CADDO SYSTEMS, INC., (Chatterjee, Arka)
March 14, 2017 Filing 10 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Microsoft Corporation.( Killough, David)
March 14, 2017 Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by David E Killough on behalf of Microsoft Corporation (Killough, David)
March 14, 2017 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Microsoft Corporation to 4/28/2017. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( nkl, )
March 13, 2017 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by 511 TECHNOLOGIES INC.; and CADDO SYSTEMS, INC.,. Microsoft Corporation served on 3/8/2017, answer due 3/29/2017. (nkl, )
March 7, 2017 Filing 7 SUMMONS Issued as to Microsoft Corporation c/o Corporation Service Compay. (nkl, )
March 6, 2017 Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Elizabeth L DeRieux on behalf of 511 TECHNOLOGIES INC.; and CADDO SYSTEMS, INC., (DeRieux, Elizabeth)
March 6, 2017 Filing 5 NOTICE of Designation of Attorney in Charge to Marc A Fenster on behalf of 511 TECHNOLOGIES INC.; and CADDO SYSTEMS, INC., (Fenster, Marc)
March 6, 2017 Filing 4 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Fenster, Marc)
March 6, 2017 Filing 3 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by 511 TECHNOLOGIES INC.; and CADDO SYSTEMS, INC.,. (Fenster, Marc)
March 6, 2017 Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by 511 TECHNOLOGIES INC.; and CADDO SYSTEMS, INC., (Fenster, Marc)
March 6, 2017 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against Microsoft Corporation ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-6186832.), filed by 511 TECHNOLOGIES INC.; and CADDO SYSTEMS, INC.,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - '411 Patent, #2 Exhibit B - '301 Patent, #3 Exhibit C - '836 Patent, #4 Exhibit D - '880 Patent, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Fenster, Marc)
March 6, 2017 Case Assigned to Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (nkl, )
March 6, 2017 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (nkl, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: 511 TECHNOLOGIES INC.; and CADDO SYSTEMS, INC., v. Microsoft Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: 511 TECHNOLOGIES INC.; and CADDO SYSTEMS, INC.,
Represented By: Marc A Fenster
Represented By: Elizabeth L DeRieux
Represented By: Arka D Chatterjee
Represented By: Paul Anthony Kroeger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Microsoft Corporation
Represented By: David E Killough
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?