Fractus, S.A. v. Verizon Communications Inc. et al
| Fractus, S.A. |
| Verizon Communications Inc. and Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless |
| CommScope Technologies LLC |
| David Folsom |
| 2:2018cv00138 |
| April 9, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Marshall Office |
| Anderson |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 22
ORDER FOR INTERVENTION - CommScope is permitted to intervene in this action and is GRANTED LEAVE to file its Answer in Intervention in the above-captioned cases, which it shall do within fourteen (14) days of this Order. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 10/15/2018. (ch, )
|
|
Filing 21
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediator David Folsom, Jackson Walker, L.L.P., 6002-B Summerfield Drive, Texarkana, Texas 75503, telephone number 903-255-3251, fax number 903-255-3266, and email dfolsom@jw.com, is hereby appointed as mediator. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 7/6/18. (ch, )
|
|
Filing 20
CONSOLIDATION ORDER - The above-captioned cases are hereby ORDERED to be CONSOLIDATED for allpretrial issues (except venue) with the LEAD CASE, Cause No. 2:18-cv-00135. All parties areinstructed to file any future filings (except relating to venue) in the LEAD CASE. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 5/29/2018. (ch, )
|
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Adriana Riviere-Badell on behalf of Fractus, S.A. (Riviere-Badell, Adriana) |
| Filing 18 Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, Verizon Communications Inc..( Jones, Michael) |
| Filing 17 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, Verizon Communications Inc..( Jones, Michael) |
| Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless to 5/31/2018; Verizon Communications Inc. to 5/31/2018. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, ) |
| Defendant's Unopposed SECOND Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless to 6/15/2018; Verizon Communications Inc. to 6/15/2018. 15 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, ) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Andrea Leigh Fair on behalf of Fractus, S.A. (Fair, Andrea) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Claire Abernathy Henry on behalf of Fractus, S.A. (Henry, Claire) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Thomas John Ward, Jr on behalf of Fractus, S.A. (Ward, Thomas) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Michael Meir Rosen on behalf of Fractus, S.A. (Rosen, Michael) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Hugham Chan on behalf of Fractus, S.A. (Chan, Hugham) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Fractus, S.A.. Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless served on 4/10/2018, answer due 5/1/2018. (DeRieux, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Fractus, S.A.. Verizon Communications Inc. served on 4/10/2018, answer due 5/1/2018. (DeRieux, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Issued as to Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless The Corporation Trust Company Corporation Trust Center, Verizon Communications Inc. c/o The Corporation Trust Company Corporation Trust Center. (Attachments: #1 Summons(es) Verizon Communications Inc.)(nkl, ) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Elizabeth L DeRieux on behalf of Fractus, S.A. (DeRieux, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Sidney Calvin Capshaw, III on behalf of Fractus, S.A. (Capshaw, Sidney) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Daniel Amon Zaheer on behalf of Fractus, S.A. (Zaheer, Daniel) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Designation of Attorney in Charge to Michael K Ng on behalf of Fractus, S.A. (Ng, Michael) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Attachments: #1 Supplement)(Ng, Michael) |
| Filing 3 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Fractus, S.A.. (Ng, Michael) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Fractus, S.A. (Ng, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, Verizon Communications Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-6731656.), filed by Fractus, S.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - '191 Patent, #2 Exhibit B - '918 Patent, #3 Exhibit C - '768 Patent, #4 Exhibit D - '870 Patent, #5 Exhibit E - '256 Patent, #6 Exhibit F - '493 Patent, #7 Exhibit G - '940 Patent, #8 Exhibit H - '814 Patent, #9 Exhibit I - '824 Patent, #10 Exhibit J - '305 Patent, #11 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ng, Michael) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, ) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (ch, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
