CXT Systems, Inc. v. Tailored Brands, Inc.
| CXT Systems, Inc. |
| Tailored Brands, Inc. |
| 2:2018cv00235 |
| May 24, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Marshall Office |
| Harrison |
| Roy S Payne |
| Robert W Schroeder |
| Patent |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
CONSOLIDATION ORDER - The above-captioned cases are CONSOLIDATED for all pretrial issues (except venue) with Lead Case No. 2:18-CV-00171-RWS-RSP. All parties are instructed to file future filings (except relating to venue) in the Lead Case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 8/16/2018. (ch, )
|
| Filing 13 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Tailored Brands, Inc. (Brophy, Richard) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, Affirmative Defenses and, COUNTERCLAIM against CXT Systems, Inc. by Tailored Brands, Inc..(Brophy, Richard) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Mark Aaron Thomas on behalf of Tailored Brands, Inc. (Thomas, Mark) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Justin Kurt Truelove on behalf of CXT Systems, Inc. (Truelove, Justin) |
| Filing 9 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Tailored Brands, Inc..( Brophy, Richard) |
| Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is GRANTED pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Tailored Brands, Inc. to 8/9/2018. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( slo, ) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Vincent J Rubino, III on behalf of CXT Systems, Inc. (Rubino, Vincent) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Shahar Harel on behalf of CXT Systems, Inc. (Harel, Shahar) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Issued as to Tailored Brands, Inc.. (ch, ) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Peter Lambrianakos on behalf of CXT Systems, Inc. (Lambrianakos, Peter) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Alfred Ross Fabricant on behalf of CXT Systems, Inc. (Fabricant, Alfred) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III. (ch, ) |
| REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 5/25/2018. (ch, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, ) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Fabricant, Alfred) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by CXT Systems, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Quest Patent Research Corporation for CXT Systems, Inc.. (Fabricant, Alfred) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against Tailored Brands, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-6790743.), filed by CXT Systems, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(Fabricant, Alfred) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
