Altair Logix LLC v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Plaintiff: Altair Logix LLC
Defendant: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Case Number: 2:2018cv00326
Filed: July 30, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office: Marshall Office
County: Anderson
Presiding Judge: Rodney Gilstrap
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 6, 2018 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Altair Logix LLC. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. served on 7/31/2018, answer due 10/5/2018. (Bennett, David)
August 3, 2018 Filing 7 Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC..( Smith, Melissa)
August 3, 2018 Filing 6 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC..( Smith, Melissa)
August 3, 2018 Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. to 9/20/2018. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, )
August 3, 2018 Defendant's Unopposed SECOND Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. to 10/5/2018. 15 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, )
July 31, 2018 Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued as to SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.. (ch, )
July 31, 2018 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, )
July 31, 2018 Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (ch, )
July 30, 2018 Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Altair Logix LLC (Bennett, David)
July 30, 2018 Filing 3 NOTICE by Altair Logix LLC re #1 Complaint, of Related Cases (Bennett, David)
July 30, 2018 Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Bennett, David)
July 30, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-6875905.), filed by Altair Logix LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - U.S. Patent No. 6,289,434, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Bennett, David)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Altair Logix LLC v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Altair Logix LLC
Represented By: David R Bennett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Represented By: Melissa Richards Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?