Karamelion LLC v. AT&T Digital Life, Inc.
Karamelion LLC |
AT&T Digital Life, Inc. |
2:2018cv00331 |
August 1, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Marshall Office |
Anderson |
Rodney Gilstrap |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Karamelion LLC. AT&T Digital Life, Inc. served on 8/2/2018, answer due 10/8/2018. (Bennett, David) |
Filing 7 Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re AT&T Digital Life, Inc.( Dyll, Timothy) |
Filing 6 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re AT&T Digital Life, Inc.( Dyll, Timothy) |
Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for AT&T Digital Life, Inc. to 10/8/2018. 15 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( nkl, ) |
Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for AT&T Digital Life, Inc. to 9/22/2018. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( nkl, ) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued as to AT&T Digital Life, Inc.. (ch, ) |
Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Karamelion LLC (Bennett, David) |
Filing 3 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Bennett, David) |
Filing 2 NOTICE by Karamelion LLC re #1 Complaint, Notice of Related Cases (Bennett, David) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against AT&T Digital Life, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-6879182.), filed by Karamelion LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - U.S. Patent No. 6,275,166, #2 Exhibit B - U.S. Patent No. 6,873,245, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Bennett, David) |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, ) |
Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (ch, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Karamelion LLC v. AT&T Digital Life, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Karamelion LLC | |
Represented By: | David R Bennett |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: AT&T Digital Life, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Timothy J Dyll |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.