Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC v. Google LLC et al
Plaintiff: Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC
Defendant: YouTube, LLC and Google LLC
Case Number: 2:2018cv00466
Filed: November 5, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Robert W Schroeder
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 29, 2018 Filing 15 Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re YouTube, LLC.( Jones, Michael)
November 29, 2018 Filing 14 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re YouTube, LLC.( Jones, Michael)
November 29, 2018 Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for YouTube, LLC to 1/11/2019. 14 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( nkl, )
November 29, 2018 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for YouTube, LLC to 12/28/2018. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( nkl, )
November 13, 2018 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Google LLC to 12/27/2018. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( nkl, )
November 13, 2018 Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Google LLC to 1/11/2019. 15 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( nkl, )
November 12, 2018 Filing 13 Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Google LLC.( Jones, Michael)
November 12, 2018 Filing 12 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Google LLC.( Jones, Michael)
November 9, 2018 Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC. YouTube, LLC served on 11/7/2018, answer due 11/28/2018. (Hipskind, Daniel)
November 9, 2018 Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC. Google LLC served on 11/6/2018, answer due 11/27/2018. (Hipskind, Daniel)
November 6, 2018 Filing 9 SUMMONS Issued as to Google LLC, YouTube, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Summons(es))(ch, )
November 6, 2018 Case assigned to District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III. (ch, )
November 6, 2018 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, )
November 5, 2018 Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Eric Benjamin Hanson on behalf of Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC (Hanson, Eric)
November 5, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Dorian S. Berger on behalf of Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC (Berger, Dorian)
November 5, 2018 Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Elizabeth L DeRieux on behalf of Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC (DeRieux, Elizabeth)
November 5, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE of Designation of Attorney in Charge to Daniel P. Hipskind on behalf of Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC (Hipskind, Daniel)
November 5, 2018 Filing 4 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Hipskind, Daniel)
November 5, 2018 Filing 3 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC. (Hipskind, Daniel)
November 5, 2018 Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC (Hipskind, Daniel)
November 5, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against Google LLC, YouTube, LLC ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-7013702.), filed by Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hipskind, Daniel)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC v. Google LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC
Represented By: Daniel P. Hipskind
Represented By: Dorian S. Berger
Represented By: Eric Benjamin Hanson
Represented By: Elizabeth L DeRieux
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: YouTube, LLC
Represented By: Michael E Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Google LLC
Represented By: Michael E Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?